I've simply cut and pasted an email thread post-Cowman below detailing our times and improvements from Cowman 2011. There is some detailed and, in the main, more rudimentary analysis, of the triathlon challenge. Best to read up from the bottom which starts with one of most profound bits of analysis. You will also get a good feel for some of the banter that gets circulated on the 'Disclosure' emails....
And
now with run improvements.
|
Name
|
TOTAL
|
Total
2011
|
Improvement
|
Run +5
|
Run 2011
|
Improvement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roland
Chuter
|
05:01:01
|
04:47:35
|
00:13:26
|
01:39:01
|
01:34:18
|
00:04:43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan
Kirwan
|
05:08:50
|
05:45:06
|
00:36:16
|
01:42:57
|
02:02:04
|
00:19:07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will
Durden
|
05:11:20
|
05:57:32
|
00:46:12
|
01:38:23
|
01:53:43
|
00:15:20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark
Williams
|
05:16:48
|
05:33:39
|
00:16:51
|
01:38:37
|
01:49:01
|
00:10:24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom
Pugh
|
05:28:00
|
|
|
01:43:02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emily
Gibbs
|
05:46:41
|
|
|
01:45:39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hannah
Durden
|
05:47:12
|
06:07:09
|
00:19:57
|
01:49:09
|
02:00:36
|
00:11:27
|
From: Emily Gibbs [mailto:emily.gibbs@ft.com]
Sent: 10 July 2012 09:43
To: Roland Chuter
Cc: Will Durden (willdurden@hotmail.co.uk); Williams, Mark UK; Jonathan.Kirwan@sellarproperty.com; Pugh, Thomas - HMT (Thomas.Pugh@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk); Hannah Durden (HDurden@fandcreit.com); Chris Beard
Subject: Re: The Results
Sent: 10 July 2012 09:43
To: Roland Chuter
Cc: Will Durden (willdurden@hotmail.co.uk); Williams, Mark UK; Jonathan.Kirwan@sellarproperty.com; Pugh, Thomas - HMT (Thomas.Pugh@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk); Hannah Durden (HDurden@fandcreit.com); Chris Beard
Subject: Re: The Results
Bring on 2013.....
On 10 July 2012 09:40, Roland
Chuter <R.Chuter@steel-sci.com>
wrote:
One more thing…..
What’s particularly impressive is
the improvement from last year especially on the run which in a long tri I
think really gives an indication of fitness and ability to stay the course.
I’ve added 5mins onto this year’s run times as it was short but there’s still
big improvements. On the overall times, there are huge improvements, I haven’t
added 5mins here as I reckon the wind was worth about the same.
One interesting point is that if
Emily had started last year she would have beaten Will and been breathing down
Kirwan’s neck!
|
Name
|
TOTAL
|
Total 2011
|
Improvement
|
Run +5
|
Run 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roland Chuter
|
05:01:01
|
04:47:35
|
00:13:26
|
01:39:01
|
01:34:18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Kirwan
|
05:08:50
|
05:45:06
|
00:36:16
|
01:42:57
|
02:02:04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will Durden
|
05:11:20
|
05:57:32
|
00:46:12
|
01:38:23
|
01:53:43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Williams
|
05:16:48
|
05:33:39
|
00:16:51
|
01:38:37
|
01:49:01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Pugh
|
05:28:00
|
|
|
01:43:02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emily Gibbs
|
05:46:41
|
|
|
01:45:39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hannah Durden
|
05:47:12
|
06:07:09
|
00:19:57
|
01:49:09
|
02:00:36
|
Sent: 09 July 2012 16:11
To: Williams, Mark UK; Roland Chuter; Jonathan.Kirwan@sellarproperty.com;
Pugh, Thomas - HMT (Thomas.Pugh@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk);
Emily Gibbs (emily.gibbs@ft.com);
Hannah Durden (HDurden@fandcreit.com)
Cc: Chris Beard
Subject: RE: The Results
Taken a little
bit further.
Interestingly,
some rudimentary stats analysis of the importance using position finished
within the various disciplines as the indicator would suggest that swimming is
for show, the bike is for the dough. From this (supported by non-statistical
research conducted on the course) the run is purely for misery
Pughy is
probably the man to confirm whether or not what I’m saying above is actually
true
No comments:
Post a Comment